Coal Age

JAN 2016

Coal Age Magazine - For more than 100 years, Coal Age has been the magazine that readers can trust for guidance and insight on this important industry.

Issue link: https://coal.epubxp.com/i/629433

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 12 of 51

On that day, the 34-year-old plant near Beulah in Mercer County experienced a mechanical failure in one of its turbine-dri- ven feedpumps. The entire plant tripped offline, with some tube lines rupturing, causing a fire. A piece of auxiliary equipment and the plant's roof were damaged in the process. Coyote is a mine- mouth operation with Dakota Westmoreland Corp.'s Beulah lig- nite surface mine. For about three weeks, the plant was completely out of ser- vice before repairs could be made to allow Coyote to resume about 50% capacity. But repairs to the remainder of the plant would take consid- erably longer. In late December, the Fergus Falls, Minnesota- based utility was in the process of powering up Coyote after all of the repairs finally had been completed, according to compa- ny spokeswoman Cris Oehler. Otter Tail operates Coyote and owns 35% of the baseload facility. Other co-owners include Northern Municipal Power Agency, 30%; Montana-Dakota Resources, 25%; and NorthWestern Energy, 10%. Otter Tail remains primarily a coal-fired utility. In addition to Coyote, the company also owns the 475-megawatt Big Stone coal plant near Milbank, South Dakota, and the 138-megawatt Hoot Lake coal plant near Fergus Falls. Hoot Lake currently is scheduled to run until 2021, when it will be retired and replaced in part by a new natural gas-burning plant. But Otter Tail has no plans to shutter Coyote and Big Stone or repower them with natural gas. Dakota Westmoreland's 9,000-acre Beulah mine, located about 75 miles northwest of Bismarck, North Dakota, annually produces about 3 million tons and has about 135 employees. The mine pro- duced 1.65 million tons of coal in the first nine months of 2015, according to the Mine Safety and Health Administration. Dakota Westmoreland officials have declined to comment on the impact of Coyote's partial idling on the mine. It is a sub- sidiary of Westmoreland Coal Co. of Englewood, Colorado. AEP Awaits Approval on Proposed Settlement American Electric Power Co. (AEP), one of the largest electric utilities and coal consumers in the country, should find out in early 2016 if it will be guaranteed of earning a profit from the continued operation of some of its coal-burning power plants in Ohio for at least the next eight years. In an unusual develop- ment, the coal industry essentially finds itself on the same side as its arch nemesis, the Sierra Club national environmental group, in supporting — or at least, not officially opposing — a proposed AEP-related settlement filed in December with the Ohio Public Utilities Commission (PUCO). Under the deal backed by more than a dozen key stakeholders in AEP's controversial power purchase agreement case before the commission, the Columbus, Ohio-based company would receive customer support to keep running power plants it mostly co- owns with utilities that generate more than 3,000 megawatts of electricity. They include AEP's ownership interest totaling 2,671 megawatts in the Conesville, Cardinal, Stuart and Zimmer plants, as well as the company's 423-megawatt share of the Ohio Valley Electric Corp., operator of the Kyger Creek and Clifty Creek coal plants in Ohio and Indiana, respectively. Critics of the proposed settlement, including other environ- mental and consumer groups, point out that AEP has not defi- nitely said it will close the affected plants over the next several years and therefore does not need what they consider to be a "subsidy" to keep them open. During the past two years, the company has retired more than 6,000 megawatts of coal genera- tion, primarily to comply with the federal Environmental Protection Agency's new pollution control rules. But the plants in question are "merchant" facilities, selling their power into the wholesale market of PJM Interconnection, a region- al electric grid operator based in Pennsylvania. If the PUCO approves the deal, the plants ostensibly would be re-regulated. Because the plants are baseload operations, meaning they are able to produce power around the clock, AEP insists they are needed to ensure reliability and diversity of supply for its nearly 1.5 million customers in Ohio. The proposed settlement reached with the PUCO staff, Ohio Energy Group, Ohio Hospital Association, Mid-Atlantic Renewable Energy Coalition and others would require AEP to convert Conesville Units 5 and 6 to co-fire natural gas with coal no later than December 31, 2017, subject to regulatory approval. AEP also would retire, refuel, or repower Cardinal Unit 1 and Conesville Units 5 and 6 to only use gas by the end of 2029 and 2030, respectively. And, among other provisions, AEP agreed to develop at least 900 megawatts of solar and wind energy pro- jects in Ohio over the next five years. Largely because of the solar/wind and co-firing concessions by AEP, the Sierra Club agreed not to oppose the settlement. The group for several years has waged a national "Beyond Coal" campaign and feels the settlement will aid in moving AEP away from its historically heavy emphasis on coal power sooner rather than later. Not everyone agrees. In a late December filing with the com- mission, the Environmental Law & Policy Center, Ohio Environmental Group and Environmental Defense Fund argued the premise of the settlement regarding noncore issues such as energy efficiency, repowering, research and development, and grid modernization "could all produce economically subopti- mal outcomes not in tune with market forces." The settlement provides for AEP Ohio, an AEP subsidiary, to recoup from its customers the entire cost of running the plants, and the company would earn at least a 10% return on their operation. AEP contends the power could be sold at sufficient above-market prices to provide up to $100 million in customer credits over eight years. One of the most vocal opponents is Dynegy, a Houston- based merchant generator that, along with Dayton Power & Light, co-owns some of the plants included in the settlement. Dynegy complained to the commission in December that, unlike AEP, it does not have the ability to force customers to subsidize the operation of inefficient or unprofitable plants. "Ohio has thrived through its competitive retail and whole- sale markets, which AEP favored when they were adopted," said Dynegy President and CEO Robert Flexon. "This ill-advised action of the PUCO staff only hurts the citizens and competitive profile of Ohio in the long run." Dynegy has threatened to sue if the commission approves the settlement. n e w s c o n t i n u e d January 2016 www.coalage.com 11

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Coal Age - JAN 2016